U.S. allies worry: Russia’s missile exercise may be tip of nuclear iceberg

October 2016 MOSCOW Russia deployed nuclear-capable missiles this month to its territory in the Baltic Sea, its latest aggressive move with nuclear weapons that alarms the West. Worrisome signs include increased talk about using nuclear weapons, more military maneuvers with nuclear arms, development of advanced nuclear munitions and public discussion of a new war doctrine that accelerates the use of such weapons.
“Russia is exercising its military forces and its nuclear force more offensively than it used to do,” said Hans Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists in Washington. How to respond “is hotly debated in NATO,” he said. “Eastern European countries want a robust response, even on the nuclear side,” Kristensen said. “Western countries want NATO to take conventional steps. There’s a lack of appetite in NATO overall to go too gung-ho in the nuclear realm right now.”
Though the United States and Russia have comparable arsenals of long-range nuclear weapons, the United States has eliminated all but 500 low-yield warheads in its short-range arsenal. By contrast, Russia has modernized its short-range weapons in recent years and accumulated about 2,000 low-yield warheads, according to a study by Kristensen. The temporary deployment in Kaliningrad, which Russia retained after the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1991, was part of a training exercise, according to Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov.


Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite called the deployment an “open demonstration of power and aggression against not the Baltic States but against European capitals.” A senior Obama administration official told USA TODAY the United States and its European allies are closely monitoring the situation in Kaliningrad and encouraged Russia to refrain from actions that increase tensions with its neighbors. The official did not want to be named because of the sensitivity of the matter. The official pointed out that last month, Russia pulled out of a joint U.S.-Russian agreement to monitor each other’s disposal of plutonium fuel from dismantled nuclear weapons. Russia’s nuclear saber-rattling risks creating miscalculations and misunderstandings in a crisis, the official said. Senior U.S. officials, including Secretary of State John Kerry, have complained about Russia’s lack of compliance with its obligations under the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty, signed in 1987 by President Ronald Reagan and Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev. The treaty bars the production, testing or deployment of ground-based missiles with a range of 300 to 3,400 miles.

Russian officials have employed similar nuclear threats since the seizure of Ukraine’s Crimea province in 2014. In March 2015, while Denmark considered participating in a NATO missile shield, Russia’s ambassador to Copenhagen, Mikhail Vanin, told the newspaper Jyllands-Posten that Danes should consider that such a move would prompt Russia to target Danish warships with nuclear missiles. In August 2014, after the Crimean invasion, Russian President Vladimir Putin reminded an audience at a youth camp “that Russia is one of the leading nuclear powers,” and “it’s best not to mess with us.”
Analyst Peter Doran of the Center for European Policy Analysis in Washington said Russia’s foreign policy and war-fighting strategy are “evolving faster than our responses can keep up.” Steven Pifer, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, said NATO officials and other observers disagree on whether the rhetoric and surge in nuclear activity is a bluff to counter superior NATO forces, or part of a new Russian strategy that combines nuclear threats, conventional warfare and low-yield nuclear weapons in the battlefield against NATO forces that are more numerous and technologically advanced. “If you’re Vladimir Putin, you’re making an effort to portray Russia as a superpower,” Pifer said. “The only asset Russia has as a superpower is lots of nuclear weapons.”  –USA Today

War Watch

This entry was posted in Act of terrorism, Acts of Agression, Arms Race, Civil Unrest, Computer Hacking, Conflict Among Nations, Currency - Economic warfare, Cyber Attack, Economic Collapse, EMP Threat, Escalating hostilities, Espionage, Flashpoint for war, Geopolitical Crisis, Hoarding Resources, Infrastructure collapse, Military Alliances, Nuclear Proliferation, Preparation for War, Protests, Resource War, Rumors of War, Tech War, Terrorism threat. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to U.S. allies worry: Russia’s missile exercise may be tip of nuclear iceberg

  1. Dennis E. says:

    Yes, a cyber attack as we experienced this past week: Which seemed to be centered on commercial sites.

    Now, this is what you really have to worry about, if you want to.

    An insider, friendly to The Russians, perhaps a Russian agent, working in a key defense communication center, introducing a virus into the defense computer system that controls early warning and defense missile launches.
    I like the reduction of short range tactical nuclear missiles. However, those missile could nearly be obsolete based on type of weaponry that has bee developed and are. Having a very large number of short range missiles are just simply over kill. Some of those are in reserve and probably not, PROBABLY NOT, mounted on a rocket to be launched.

    A new arms race is about to be started, it seems

    • @ Dennis E. says:

      “A New Arms Race Is About To Be Started?!”…

      R U SERIOUS!!! WTF Have you been… or has your head been?!

      You’re better off calling it a “Weapons/Missile Race”…

      The Russkies are about to RACE their Missiles to America and vice versa!!!
      There’s about to be a WAR…. NOT an Arms Race!!!

      • Dennis E. says:

        Where it is suppose to be, my head, that is.

        In regard to a new Arms Race, Trump or Hillary will highlight our weakness in this area.
        The lack of short range Tactical Missiles. At one time The U.S. had several thousand
        warheads in Europe. And the talk will be need to catch up with The Russians, and that is an arms race.

        Some of the news we hear now, some of the words, is the same that was spoken/written before Ronald Reagan was elected. At that time under President Jimmy Carter, we were being terribly pushed around as we are being now under The Obama Administration and Trumps rhetoric at times mirrors Reagan s, minus the personal allegations and conduct at his rallies.

        Putin is still dreaming at this time to return The Cold War Years and The reestablishment of the Soviet Union which includes many of The Eastern European Nations.

        We live in a time of Wars and Rumors of War.

        War will eventually break out, but right now the building of missiles, planes, tanks and such is big money. It is possible that Russia and China will hit The U.S. and we them, and we will lose.
        In 1973, we almost had a Nuclear exchange with Russia over their threatened invention in The Yom Kippur War when Israelis tanks were seen heading toward Damascus.

        You have to look at the broad picture. China could lose 100 million people, but we and The Russians could not and prevail.

  2. Mark Baldwin says:

    I continue to be disturbed by our government’s actions and the rhetoric that comes out. The following statement is made above: Analyst Peter Doran of the Center for European Policy Analysis in Washington said Russia’s foreign policy and war-fighting strategy are “evolving faster than our responses can keep up.” By using the term ‘our responses’ it sounds like Russia is the aggressor. This has clearly not been the case. It is time for some sanity…..PLEASE wake up!

  3. John Berbatis says:

    Humanity’s best hope for survival is to rid the world of weapons, and that’s not going to happen… so don’t take your Life for granted.

    • Utopia: the Collapse says:

      No, it’s not going to happen. It’s easier for them to rid the world of us than for these weapons to perish.

  4. Sandy G says:

    Thank you Alvin for keeping us informed.

  5. Dennis E. says:

    We should not deploy tactical nuclear weapons to any Eastern European Country.
    It could ignite a Russian Military response.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s